India's most trusted SME M&A marketplace · USD 1.5bn in live deals · Register free →

Guide for Indian SME Owners — 2026

What Is a Term Sheet? A Plain-English Guide for Indian SME Owners

If a PE fund, family office, or angel investor has expressed serious interest in your business, the next thing you will receive is a term sheet. If you have never seen one before, it can feel like a legal document written in another language. This guide translates it — clause by clause — into plain English, so you know what you are agreeing to before you sign.

Who this guide is for: Indian SME owners who have received — or are expecting to receive — a term sheet from a PE fund, family office, or angel investor for the first time. It assumes no prior legal or investment banking knowledge. Fund-raisers advising SME clients on equity fundraising will also find it useful as a plain-English reference.

HC
Reviewed by Hormazd Charna — Founder & CEO, MergerDomo
MBA Finance · Corporate and investment banking experience across Deloitte, Kotak and Tata Capital
Disclaimer: This guide is general educational information for Indian SME founders and is not legal, tax, or investment advice. Always consult a qualified corporate lawyer and tax advisor on your specific transaction.
📋 Key Takeaways
A term sheet is usually non-binding on commercial terms but can bind founders immediately on exclusivity, confidentiality, costs and announcements. Before signing, Indian SME founders should review valuation, ESOP dilution, liquidation preference, anti-dilution, reserved matters, exit rights, warranties, indemnities, lender consent, and FEMA and tax compliance.
7 Before you sign — check these first
1 ESOP pool timing — is the option pool created before or after your valuation is set? If it is created before, it comes out of your share — not the investor's.
2 Liquidation preference — does the investor get paid first when the business is sold? And do they get paid twice — once as a preference and again as an equity holder? Push for 1x non-participating.
3 Anti-dilution mechanism — if you raise money at a lower valuation in future, how much does the investor's stake automatically increase at your expense? Weighted average is fairer than full ratchet.
4 Can the investor force a sale without your agreement? Some drag-along clauses allow the investor to compel a sale of your business even if you do not want to sell. Check who controls this right and at what ownership threshold.
5 Are you personally obliged to buy back the investor's shares? If the investor cannot exit within a defined period, some term sheets require you personally — not just the company — to buy them out. Without a cap on that amount, this is one of the most financially dangerous clauses you can sign.
6 Warranty cap — if something you said about your business turns out to be wrong, how much can the investor claim from you personally — and for how long? Make sure there is a clear cap and a time limit.
7 Have you told your bank? Most SME loan agreements require the bank's consent if ownership of the company changes materially. Taking on a PE investor without notifying your bank can put you in technical default on your existing loans — even if every payment is on time.

Introduction

Quick Answer
A term sheet is a non-binding document that records the proposed commercial terms of an investment before due diligence and definitive agreements begin. In Indian SME fundraising, founders should pay close attention not only to valuation, but also to dilution, liquidation preference, anti-dilution, board rights, reserved matters, exit rights, warranties, indemnities, lender consent, and FEMA and tax compliance.

A term sheet is a short document — typically 8 to 15 pages — that sets out the headline commercial terms on which an investor proposes to invest in your business. You will receive it after initial meetings and financial review, and before the investor formally begins due diligence on your company.

For most Indian SME owners, this is the first time they have seen a document like this. The instinct is often to focus on the valuation number at the top and treat everything else as standard legal language. That instinct is expensive. The clauses that follow the valuation — liquidation preference, anti-dilution, reserved matters, drag-along, put options, warranties — will shape how much control you retain, how much you receive when you eventually exit, and what personal financial exposure you carry for years after the deal closes.

Most commercial terms in a term sheet are non-binding on the parties. However, certain clauses are typically expressed as binding immediately on signing — most commonly exclusivity, confidentiality, costs and expenses, governing law, dispute resolution, and provisions relating to public announcements. Some term sheets also include a break fee. The specific clauses that are binding depend on the drafting, so read the term sheet carefully before signing to identify which provisions carry immediate legal effect.

Once a term sheet is signed, both sides have invested credibility in the deal. The investor has presented it to their investment committee, and you have likely told your CA, family, and advisors that the deal is moving forward. Practically speaking, materially reopening commercial terms after signing is uncommon — which is why reviewing every clause before you sign is the most important thing you can do in the entire fundraising process.

The term sheet and what follows — SHA, SSA and AoA explained

The term sheet is the first document you will sign in a fundraising. It is followed by two definitive legal agreements that give binding legal force to the terms you agreed at term sheet stage. Understanding what each document does, and how they relate to each other and to the term sheet, prevents surprises later in the process.

The Share Subscription Agreement (SSA) governs the actual issuance of new shares or instruments to the investor. It records what is being issued, at what price, under what conditions, and what representations and warranties the company and promoters make about the business. The SSA is legally binding.

The Shareholders' Agreement (SHA) governs the ongoing relationship between the company, the promoters, and the investor after the investment closes. It covers board rights, reserved matters, transfer restrictions, drag-along and tag-along rights, information obligations, and exit mechanics. The SHA is what you will live under for the next five to seven years.

The Articles of Association (AoA) is the constitutional document of the company, registered with the Registrar of Companies. Investor rights that need to be enforceable against third parties — pre-emption rights, transfer restrictions — must be incorporated into the AoA, not just the SHA. Amending the AoA requires a special resolution of shareholders and a ROC filing, which forms part of the closing process.

In practice, the SSA and SHA are negotiated simultaneously and executed on the same day as part of a single closing. The AoA is amended at or around the same time.

If you need help identifying a qualified corporate lawyer with PE transaction experience, MergerDomo's advisory network can connect you with the right professional for your sector and deal size. Learn about MergerDomo's CaaS advisory services →

Anatomy of a term sheet — what every section covers

A typical PE or growth equity term sheet for an Indian SME covers the following areas in roughly this order:

Section What it covers What it means for you
Issuer and investor Who is investing, in what vehicle, through what entity Confirm which legal entity is investing — this affects your future dealings and any FEMA compliance if the investor is foreign
Investment amount and instrument How much, in what form — equity shares, CCD, or CCPS The instrument type affects who gets paid first if the business is wound up or sold at a low valuation
Valuation Pre-money valuation and resulting post-money stake Check the maths yourself — pre-money and post-money are different numbers. Also check if the ESOP pool reduces your share before or after valuation is set
Use of proceeds What the capital is for Some investors treat this as loosely binding — be specific about what you intend to use the money for
Conditions precedent What must be true or done before funds are transferred These are the tasks between signing and receiving money. Negotiate a long-stop date so the investor cannot hold you in limbo indefinitely
Board and governance Seats, reserved matters, information rights The reserved matters list determines which business decisions you need the investor's approval for. This affects your day-to-day operational freedom
Economic rights Liquidation preference, anti-dilution, distributions These clauses determine how much you actually receive when the business is sold — which may be significantly less than your equity percentage suggests
Transfer restrictions Lock-in, ROFR, tag-along, drag-along These clauses restrict when and how you can sell your own shares, and whether the investor can force you into a sale you do not want
Exit IPO drag, put option, mandatory exit timeline The investor must exit eventually — these clauses define when and how, and what happens if no exit is available. A personal put obligation is the most financially dangerous provision here
Promoter obligations Warranties, lock-in, salary, related-party restrictions You personally warrant the accuracy of everything you have said about your business. If something turns out to be wrong, you may be personally liable
Exclusivity Duration and scope — typically binding immediately on signing Once you sign, you cannot negotiate with any other investor for the exclusivity period — even if this investor walks away
Confidentiality Who can be told what — typically binding immediately on signing Do not announce the deal to staff, customers, or suppliers until the SSA is signed and money is in your account
Governing law Almost always Indian law for domestic investors For domestic investors this is straightforward. For foreign investors, confirm jurisdiction carefully with your lawyer

Valuation, stake and dilution

The term sheet will state a pre-money valuation — the value attributed to your business before the investment. The investor's ownership percentage is: investment amount ÷ (pre-money valuation + investment amount).

Many founders confuse pre-money and post-money. If the pre-money valuation is ₹20 crore and the investor puts in ₹5 crore, the investor owns 5 ÷ 25 = 20% — not 25%.

The ESOP pool timing trap

Many term sheets require an Employee Stock Option Pool to be created as a condition of closing. The critical question is whether the ESOP pool is carved out of the pre-money or the post-money valuation. If the term sheet requires a 10% ESOP pool to be created pre-closing, it comes out of the founder's share, not the investor's.

On the same ₹20 crore / ₹5 crore example, a 10% pre-money ESOP pool reduces the founder's effective ownership from 80% to 72%, while the investor still gets 20%. Always establish whether the ESOP is pre- or post-money before agreeing the valuation number.

Type of security — equity shares, CCDs and CCPS

Most sophisticated investors in Indian PE and growth equity deals do not subscribe for ordinary equity shares. They subscribe for Compulsorily Convertible Debentures (CCDs) or Compulsorily Convertible Preference Shares (CCPS).

CCDs are debt instruments that mandatorily convert into equity at a pre-defined event — a subsequent round, an IPO, or after a fixed period. They carry a nominal coupon, often 0.001%, which is largely irrelevant economically.

CCPS are preference shares that mandatorily convert into equity. They rank above ordinary equity shareholders on liquidation — which is where the liquidation preference mechanics in the next section apply. CCPS are the most common instrument in Indian PE minority deals.

Why investors prefer these over ordinary equity: CCDs and CCPS give investors preferential treatment on a liquidation or wind-down before conversion. They are also structurally useful for FEMA compliance in foreign investment scenarios and can carry tax and accounting advantages depending on the structure.

What this means for founders: The instrument must be genuinely and compulsorily convertible — not optionally convertible. Optionally convertible instruments are generally treated as ECB-type instruments rather than pure FDI equity under FEMA, which attracts a different and often more complex regulatory regime — this should always be confirmed with your legal and FEMA advisors. Always confirm the conversion ratio, conversion trigger, and what happens to preference rights on conversion. These must be explicit in the term sheet.

📌 Always confirm in writing
The regulatory treatment of a specific instrument under FEMA depends on its precise terms, the investor type, and the transaction structure. Confirm the classification with your legal and FEMA advisors before the term sheet is finalised — not after.

Liquidation Preference in an Indian SME Term Sheet

The liquidation preference determines who gets paid first — and how much — when the company is sold, wound up, or undergoes a liquidity event. It is the clause most Indian SME founders underestimate most severely.

The three structures

1x non-participating: The investor chooses the higher of (a) their 1x liquidation preference amount, or (b) what they would receive if they converted into ordinary equity and participated pro-rata. They do not receive both. On a strong exit, the investor converts to equity and participates with everyone else. On a weak exit, they take their preference and the founder gets what remains. This is the most founder-friendly structure.

1x participating: The investor receives 1x their invested amount first, then also participates in the remaining proceeds pro-rata on their equity stake. They receive both — the preference and the equity upside. This is significantly less favourable to founders.

2x non-participating: The same optionality as 1x non-participating, but the preference floor is 2x the invested capital. At lower exit values this is heavily weighted toward the investor.

Illustrative example only — ₹5 crore invested for 20% ownership. Actual outcomes depend on the full cap table and any senior obligations.

Structure Exit at ₹15cr — investor receives Founder receives Exit at ₹50cr — investor receives Founder receives
1x non-participating Chooses higher of ₹5cr or 20% of ₹15cr = ₹3cr. Takes ₹5cr preference. ₹10cr Chooses higher of ₹5cr or 20% of ₹50cr = ₹10cr. Converts to equity, takes ₹10cr. ₹40cr
1x participating Takes ₹5cr first, then 20% of remaining ₹10cr = ₹2cr. Total: ₹7cr. ₹8cr Takes ₹5cr first, then 20% of remaining ₹45cr = ₹9cr. Total: ₹14cr. ₹36cr
2x non-participating Chooses higher of ₹10cr or 20% of ₹15cr = ₹3cr. Takes ₹10cr preference. ₹5cr Chooses higher of ₹10cr or 20% of ₹50cr = ₹10cr. Both equal — takes ₹10cr. ₹40cr

"On a modest exit, a 2x preference leaves the founder with significantly less than their equity percentage suggests. On a strong exit, a non-participating investor converts to equity and the founder's upside is preserved. A participating structure is always more expensive to the founder than a non-participating one at the same multiple."

Push for 1x non-participating as your starting position. Resist participating structures. Any preference multiple above 1x should have clear commercial justification.

Anti-Dilution Clause: Weighted Average vs Full Ratchet

Anti-dilution provisions protect the investor if you raise a subsequent round at a lower valuation than the current round — a "down round." They work by adjusting the investor's conversion ratio so that they effectively pay less than they originally did, which dilutes the founder's stake proportionally.

Broad-based weighted average is the standard and most founder-friendly form. It adjusts the conversion price based on a weighted average of the old price and the new lower price, taking into account how many shares are issued in the down round. The impact is proportional to the severity of the down round and the size of the new issuance.

Full ratchet is the most investor-friendly and most punishing for founders. If any share is issued at a lower price than the investor's entry price — even a single share — the investor's entire holding reprices to that lower level. This can cause severe founder dilution on even a modest down round. Full ratchet is generally considered very unfavourable to founders and is uncommon in balanced deals. Resist it.

For a stable, cash-generative SME raising a single round of PE capital with no anticipated future dilution events, anti-dilution provisions may be less material in practice — but the mechanism should be understood and the drafting checked before signing.

Board Composition and Reserved Matters

Board composition. A PE investor taking a minority stake will typically ask for one board seat — sometimes two if they hold above 26% or the deal is larger. The term sheet will specify how many directors the investor can nominate and whether investor approval is required to appoint or remove the CEO.

Reserved matters are decisions the company cannot make without investor approval, regardless of what the board or majority shareholders decide. They are one of the most negotiated areas of any term sheet, because the list of reserved matters determines how much operational freedom the founder retains after closing.

Common reserved matters in Indian PE term sheets include: capital expenditure above a defined threshold; incurring new debt above a defined amount; related-party transactions; acquisition or disposal of material assets; changes to the business plan or annual budget; key management hires and terminations at CXO level; issuance of new shares; and changes to constitutional documents.

⚠ What to push back on
The threshold amounts matter as much as the categories. A reserved matter triggering at ₹50 lakh capex is materially more restrictive than one triggering at ₹3 crore. Negotiate specific thresholds, not just the categories. Push back on including routine operational decisions — day-to-day vendor contracts, standard hiring below CXO level, ordinary management decisions — in the reserved matters list. The list should cover material strategic decisions, not operational management.

Governance — Founder Salary, Related-Party Transactions and Information Rights

Founder salary

PE investors will specify the founder's salary in the term sheet or require it to be set in the SHA. This is standard practice. The investor needs to separate the founder's economic return as a shareholder from their remuneration as a manager, because EBITDA — the basis for the company's valuation and the investor's return — is calculated before salary. An inflated salary suppresses EBITDA and reduces the investor's return. Agree a market-rate salary, specified clearly, with a defined process for annual review.

Related-party transactions

If your business pays rent to a property owned by you or a family member, buys inputs from a family-owned supplier, employs relatives at above-market salaries, or has any other transactions with promoter-connected entities, expect these to be scrutinised and restricted. The term sheet will typically require all related-party transactions to be conducted at arm's length, disclosed to the board, and approved by the investor director above a threshold. Some investors require existing arrangements to be terminated or restructured as a condition of closing.

If multiple family members are active in the business in informal or undocumented roles, the investor will want clarity on their roles, remuneration, and authority. Identify and address these before the term sheet is signed — not during due diligence.

Information rights

Standard provisions include: monthly MIS reports within 15 days of month close; quarterly unaudited financials within 45 days; annual audited accounts within 120 days of financial year end; and an annual budget submitted to the board before each financial year begins. Observer rights at board meetings are common. These are standard — accept them.

Push back on real-time data access, weekly reporting, and any provision allowing the investor to share financial data with third parties without restriction.

Transfer Restrictions — Drag-Along, Tag-Along, ROFR and Lock-In

Tag-along

If the promoter sells shares to a third party, the investor has the right to sell their shares on the same terms alongside the promoter. This protects the investor from being left behind when the promoter exits. Standard — accept it.

Drag-along

If a specified majority of shareholders vote to sell the company, they can compel remaining minority shareholders to sell on the same terms. The risk is in who controls drag and at what threshold. If the investor holds 30% and the drag threshold is "shareholders holding more than 25%," the investor can drag the founder into a sale without the founder's agreement.

Negotiate the threshold so drag requires alignment between both the investor and the promoter — typically a majority of both groups must agree. Also negotiate a minimum price floor so drag cannot be exercised at a distressed valuation that recovers the investor's capital at the founder's expense.

Right of first refusal (ROFR) and pre-emption

Before transferring shares to a third party, the selling shareholder must first offer them to existing shareholders at the same price and terms. Standard on both promoter and investor shares — accept it. Negotiate the offer period to be no longer than 30 days to avoid delaying legitimate secondary transactions.

Pre-emption rights require the company to offer new shares to existing shareholders pro-rata before issuing to a third party. Standard — accept it. Ensure pre-emption does not apply to ESOP grants.

Founder lock-in and leaver provisions

Most PE term sheets impose a lock-in on the promoter's shares — typically two to four years from closing. During this period the founder cannot sell, transfer, or pledge shares without investor consent. This is standard. Negotiate that the lock-in includes permitted transfers to immediate family members or family trusts for estate planning purposes.

Some term sheets include good leaver and bad leaver provisions that determine what happens to the founder's shares if they leave during the lock-in period. A good leaver — death, disability, or termination without cause — typically retains or is bought out at fair value. A bad leaver — resignation or termination for cause — may be required to sell shares at cost or a discount. Negotiate the definitions carefully; the category into which a departure falls has significant financial consequences.

Investor Exit Rights, Put Options and IPO Drag

The investor's exit timeline is not merely aspirational. Most PE and growth equity investors negotiate contractual exit rights, and founders must understand what obligations arise if an IPO, strategic sale, or secondary sale does not materialise within the agreed period.

IPO drag

After a defined period or once the company reaches a defined scale, the investor can require the company to pursue a public listing. Negotiate the minimum IPO size, the minimum valuation at which an IPO can be demanded, and the timing. Do not agree to an IPO drag that can be exercised at any time without conditions.

Put option

If the investor has not exited by a defined date — typically 5 to 7 years from closing — many term sheets include a put option: the investor's right to require the company or the promoter personally to buy back their shares at a formula price. The formula is typically the higher of cost plus a minimum return (often expressed as an IRR floor) or fair market value.

This is the provision that can create significant personal financial liability for the promoter if an exit does not materialise. Negotiate the put option carefully — specifically the formula, the trigger date, and whether the obligation falls on the company or the promoter personally. If the put falls on you personally, ensure you can actually satisfy it. A personal put obligation without a cap or formula ceiling is one of the most financially dangerous provisions a founder can sign.

Promoter Warranties, Indemnities and Personal Exposure

When you sign the SSA, you will be asked to confirm — in writing and under legal obligation — that everything you have told the investor about your business is true. These statements are called representations and warranties. If any of them turn out to be wrong after the deal closes, the investor can make a legal claim against you personally to recover their losses. For many Indian SME owners, this is the first time in their business life they have carried this kind of personal legal exposure on a commercial transaction. It deserves careful attention.

This is not about catching you out. It is about ensuring that what the investor paid for matches what they actually received. The best protection is accurate disclosure — not optimistic warranty-giving.

What you will be asked to confirm

That the financial statements give a true and fair view with no undisclosed liabilities
That the company is in compliance with all applicable laws including GST, income tax, labour law, and environmental regulations
That all statutory dues — PF, ESIC, TDS, GST — are paid and current
That there is no pending or threatened litigation not previously disclosed
That the company owns or has valid licences to all material intellectual property
That no key contracts contain change-of-control provisions triggered by the investment

How to limit your exposure

Use a disclosure schedule. This document, attached to the SSA, qualifies your warranties. A properly disclosed item reduces or eliminates warranty liability for that specific matter. An undisclosed item that surfaces post-closing can result in a claim years after the deal is done. It is the most important document a founder prepares during the legal phase of closing.

Negotiate a warranty cap — typically 25–100% of the investment amount for general warranties, with higher or uncapped exposure only for fraud and title.

Negotiate a time limit — 18 to 24 months post-closing for general warranties; longer for tax warranties, typically aligned to the relevant limitation period.

Negotiate a de minimis threshold and basket — claims below a minimum amount should not be individually claimable, and aggregate claims should need to exceed a basket before the investor can recover anything.

Never warrant something you cannot verify. If you are uncertain about a matter, disclose it in the disclosure schedule rather than hoping it does not surface. Undisclosed issues discovered post-closing are more damaging than disclosed issues that were known going in.

MergerDomo's CaaS advisors support founders through the legal phase of closing — including disclosure schedule preparation and coordination with legal counsel. Learn about deal support services →

Debt, Lender Consent and Existing Restrictions

If your business carries bank loans, NBFC facilities, or overdraft facilities — which most Indian SMEs do — the arrival of a new investor may trigger obligations to existing lenders that you are not aware of.

Change-of-control clauses. Many standard loan agreements contain a clause requiring the bank's prior written consent if there is a material change in ownership or management. A PE investor taking a significant minority stake may or may not constitute a change of control under your specific loan agreement — the definition varies by lender. Failure to notify when required can constitute a technical default even if no payment has been missed.

Restrictive covenants. Loan agreements often restrict what the company can do without lender consent: incurring additional debt, paying dividends, making capex above a threshold, or providing guarantees. A new investor's reserved matters and your new SHA may conflict with existing covenants. These conflicts need to be identified and resolved before closing.

What to do before signing the term sheet: Review all existing loan agreements with your lawyer. Identify any change-of-control provisions, any covenants affected by the investment, and whether the new investor's governance rights conflict with existing lender rights. If bank consent is required, factor the timeline for obtaining a No Objection Certificate into your conditions precedent.

Personal guarantees. If you have given personal guarantees on company borrowings — the norm for Indian SME bank loans — consider how those guarantees interact with the new governance structure. The investor's reserved matters may limit your ability to manage the company in ways that affect the guaranteed facilities. Discuss this with your lender and lawyer before closing.

FEMA, RBI, Tax and Valuation Compliance

This section covers the compliance requirements triggered specifically by who the investor is and what instrument is being used. The Tax Considerations for SME Fundraising guide covers these topics in greater depth; this section flags the issues that arise at term sheet stage.

Foreign investors

If the investor is non-resident — a foreign fund, NRI, or overseas corporate — the investment must comply with FEMA, the FDI policy, and RBI's pricing guidelines. A key implication: shares, CCDs, or CCPS issued to a foreign investor must be priced at or above fair market value. You cannot issue to a foreign investor at a price below certified FMV. If the term sheet specifies a valuation below what the FMV certification would produce, you have a compliance problem. Identify this before signing.

CCD and CCPS structuring

The instrument must be genuinely and compulsorily convertible to qualify as FDI equity under FEMA rather than being treated as an ECB-type instrument. Optionally convertible instruments attract a different and often more complex regulatory regime. The precise classification depends on the instrument's terms, the investor type, and the transaction structure — always confirm with your legal and FEMA advisors before the term sheet is finalised.

Valuation certification

For pricing and valuation compliance — whether under the Companies Act for resident investors or under FEMA pricing rules for foreign investors — an appropriate valuation certificate or report from a qualified professional will be required. The exact requirement depends on the investor type, the instrument being issued, and the specific transaction structure. Confirm this with your CA, company secretary, or legal advisor before signing the term sheet.

Angel tax

✓ Angel Tax — Current Position (2026)
Section 56(2)(viib), commonly known as angel tax, was removed under the Finance Act (No. 2) 2024 with effect from 1 April 2025, subject to transaction timing and applicable rules. Founders should confirm the current position with their CA. Clean valuation documentation and compliance records remain important regardless.

Due Diligence, Conditions Precedent, Exclusivity and Timelines

Due diligence

Formal due diligence begins after the term sheet is signed. The investor will issue a document request list within a few days of signing, covering financial, legal, tax, and operational information. Expect 6 to 10 weeks of active diligence for a typical Indian SME fundraising. The most important thing during diligence is consistency — every number in your pitch deck, IM, and financial model must reconcile with your audited accounts, GST returns, and bank statements.

For a detailed breakdown of the due diligence process and how to prepare as a seller or fund-raiser, see the Due Diligence Guide for Indian SME Acquisitions →

Conditions precedent

Conditions precedent (CPs) are obligations that must be satisfied before the investor transfers funds. Common CPs include: completion of due diligence to the investor's satisfaction; board and shareholder approvals; AoA amendment; execution of the SHA and SSA; resolution of identified legal or regulatory issues; and any specific restructuring required such as termination of related-party arrangements or transfer of IP to the company.

Negotiate a materiality qualifier on the diligence CP — more founder-friendly drafting specifies that this CP is satisfied unless the investor identifies issues that are material to the investment, rather than leaving it entirely at the investor's discretion. Also negotiate a long-stop date — the date by which all CPs must be satisfied or the term sheet lapses. This prevents the investor from holding you in exclusivity indefinitely.

Exclusivity and confidentiality

Exclusivity means that for the duration specified — typically 30 to 60 days — you agree not to solicit, entertain, or negotiate with any other investor regarding the same financing. This is binding immediately on signing. Do not sign exclusivity while actively negotiating with other investors. Negotiate the period to be as short as is practically feasible given the due diligence timeline.

Confidentiality is also binding immediately. Do not announce a fundraise before the SSA is signed and funds are received. If the deal subsequently falls through, premature announcements cause real damage with customers, suppliers, and employees.

Typical post-signing timeline

Stage What happens Typical duration
Diligence Document review, management Q&A, site visits, issues log compiled Weeks 1–8
Legal drafting SSA, SHA, AoA amendment negotiated between lawyers Weeks 6–12
Approvals Board resolutions, shareholder EGM if AoA amendment required Weeks 10–14
Filings and closing ROC filing, FEMA filing if foreign investor, consideration received, shares allotted Weeks 12–16
Post-closing SHA operative, first board meeting under new governance, information rights begin From closing

Most delays arise from inconsistent financial records discovered in diligence, slow legal negotiation, or FEMA and ROC filing timelines for foreign investors.

Founder-Friendly Term Sheet Review Checklist

Use this before signing. Every item should have a clear written answer. If you need help working through the checklist with a qualified M&A advisor or corporate lawyer, MergerDomo's advisory network can connect you with professionals who specialise in PE and growth equity transactions for Indian SMEs.

Economics
Pre-money valuation clearly stated and post-money stake correctly calculated
ESOP pool confirmed as pre- or post-money — and effective founder ownership calculated after ESOP creation
Instrument confirmed — ordinary equity, CCD, or CCPS — and compulsorily convertible nature verified
Liquidation preference structure confirmed — push for 1x non-participating; resist participating or 2x+
Anti-dilution mechanism confirmed — broad-based weighted average preferred; full ratchet should be resisted
Control and Governance
Number of investor board seats and any casting vote confirmed
Reserved matters list reviewed — specific thresholds negotiated, not just categories
Routine operational decisions confirmed as within management's discretion
Founder salary agreed at market rate with defined review process
Existing related-party arrangements identified, disclosed, and resolved
Family members' roles, remuneration, and authority documented and clarified
Transfer Restrictions and Exit
Drag-along threshold reviewed — does investor need promoter alignment to exercise drag?
Minimum price floor on drag-along confirmed
Lock-in period confirmed with permitted family transfers included
Leaver provisions reviewed — good leaver and bad leaver definitions negotiated
Put option formula, trigger date, and obligation bearer confirmed — can you satisfy it if required?
IPO drag conditions confirmed — minimum valuation, minimum size, and timing restrictions
Compliance
All existing loan agreements reviewed for change-of-control clauses
Loan covenants checked for conflict with proposed governance structure
Bank consent obtained or scheduled and factored into CP timeline
If foreign investor: investment price at or above certified FMV confirmed
Valuation certificate requirements confirmed with CA / legal advisor
Instrument classification under FEMA confirmed with FEMA advisor
Warranties and Process
Disclosure schedule prepared — all known issues disclosed in writing
Warranty cap, basket, de minimis, and survival period negotiated
Legal advice obtained on any warranty I am uncertain about
Materiality qualifier on diligence CP negotiated
Long-stop date on conditions precedent confirmed
Exclusivity period as short as practically feasible and tied to investor's diligence obligations
Corporate lawyer with PE transaction experience engaged to review SSA and SHA
CA engaged to review tax and FEMA implications

Sources and legal references

This guide is based on publicly available regulatory frameworks and standard market practice for Indian PE and growth equity transactions. Key references:

FEMA and Foreign Investment Rules — Reserve Bank of India, FEMA Notifications and Master Directions on Foreign Investment in India. Governs pricing, instrument eligibility, reporting, and sectoral caps for non-resident investment.
Section 56(2)(viib) — Angel Tax Removal — Finance Act (No. 2) 2024; Income Tax Department of India. The provision was removed with effect from 1 April 2025. Confirm current position and applicable notifications with your CA.
Companies Act 2013 — Ministry of Corporate Affairs. Governs AoA amendments, shareholder approvals, special resolutions, ROC filings, and private company share issuance procedures.
SEBI AIF Regulations and Valuation Guidelines — Securities and Exchange Board of India. Relevant for AIF-related instruments, valuation methodology requirements, and registered valuer/merchant banker certification for share pricing.
RBI Pricing Guidelines for FDI — RBI Master Direction on Foreign Investment in India (updated periodically). Sets out the fair market value floor for issuance of equity instruments to non-resident investors and the certification requirements.

Regulations are updated periodically. Always verify the current version of any regulation with qualified legal, tax, or FEMA advisors before acting.

HC
MergerDomo Editorial Team
Reviewed by Hormazd Charna, Founder, MergerDomo · Last updated June 2026

This guide is general educational information for Indian SME founders and is not legal, tax, or investment advice. Always consult a qualified corporate lawyer and tax advisor on your specific transaction. SEBI, FEMA, RBI, and Income Tax regulations change periodically — confirm all regulatory positions with qualified advisors before acting.

Get Expert Support on Your Term Sheet

Raise equity on MergerDomo — and get the right advisors alongside you

MergerDomo connects established Indian SMEs with PE funds, family offices, and strategic investors — and provides access to M&A advisors and lawyers who can help you review a term sheet before signing.

1Create a free, confidential fund-raiser profile
2Get matched with investors active in your sector and deal size
3Access M&A advisors and legal support through MergerDomo's CaaS network
Common questions about term sheets for Indian SME fundraising
Most commercial terms are non-binding. However, certain clauses — typically exclusivity, confidentiality, costs, governing law, dispute resolution, and announcements — are expressed as binding immediately on signing. The specific binding clauses depend on the drafting. Always have a lawyer identify which provisions carry immediate legal effect before you sign.
A liquidation preference determines who gets paid first and how much when a company is sold or wound up. In a 1x non-participating structure, the investor chooses the higher of their 1x preference or their pro-rata equity share — not both. In a participating structure, the investor receives their preference amount first and then also participates in remaining proceeds. Founders should push for 1x non-participating as a starting position.
A term sheet records proposed commercial terms before due diligence and is generally non-binding. A Shareholders Agreement (SHA) is the definitive legal document that governs the ongoing relationship between the company, promoters, and investor after the investment closes — covering board rights, reserved matters, transfer restrictions, and exit mechanics. The SHA is legally binding and is negotiated from the term sheet as the starting point.
CCDs (Compulsorily Convertible Debentures) are debt instruments that mandatorily convert into equity at a pre-defined event. CCPS (Compulsorily Convertible Preference Shares) are preference shares that mandatorily convert into equity and rank above ordinary equity on liquidation. Both are common in Indian PE minority deals. The regulatory treatment of each under FEMA depends on the precise terms and transaction structure — confirm with your legal and FEMA advisors.
Focus negotiation on: ESOP pool timing (pre vs post-money), liquidation preference structure (push for 1x non-participating), anti-dilution mechanism (broad-based weighted average, not full ratchet), reserved matters thresholds, drag-along threshold and control, put option formula and who bears the obligation, warranty cap and survival period, and conditions precedent — specifically the materiality qualifier on the diligence CP and a long-stop date.
For a well-prepared Indian SME with clean financials and no significant due diligence issues, typically 3 to 5 months from term sheet to money in the bank. Complex deals or those requiring FEMA or ROC filings can take 5 to 7 months. Most delays arise from inconsistent financial records in diligence or slow legal negotiation.
A disclosure schedule is a document attached to the SSA that qualifies the warranties given by the promoter. A matter properly disclosed in the schedule generally reduces or eliminates warranty liability for that specific item. It is one of the most important documents a founder prepares during the legal phase of closing — undisclosed issues discovered post-closing are more damaging than disclosed issues known going in.
Section 56(2)(viib), commonly known as angel tax, was removed under the Finance Act (No. 2) 2024 with effect from 1 April 2025, subject to transaction timing and applicable rules. Founders should confirm the current position with their CA. Clean valuation documentation and compliance records remain important regardless.
Technically yes, but it is significantly harder in practice. Once signed, both sides have invested credibility in the deal. Negotiate before signing — that is the moment of maximum leverage. Clauses accepted without challenge at term sheet stage are difficult to reopen once lawyers begin drafting the SSA and SHA.
In an M&A context, a Letter of Intent performs a similar function for a business sale as a term sheet does for a fundraising. Both are generally non-binding on commercial terms and binding on exclusivity and confidentiality. The terminology varies by deal type and advisor preference.
Yes — most commercial terms in a term sheet are non-binding. An investor can withdraw, though breach of the exclusivity clause during the exclusivity period is a contractual breach. In practice, investors who withdraw after a signed term sheet without due cause damage their market reputation.
Yes. Even though most of the term sheet is non-binding, the provisions you accept set the frame for the SSA and SHA. A corporate lawyer with PE transaction experience — not a general business lawyer — should review before you sign. MergerDomo's advisory network can connect you with the right professional.
Still have questions? View All FAQs →